2023-06-26 05:56:33 I'm not aware of any channels about the analogue pocket; this channel is primarily for discussion of RetroForth. 2023-06-26 10:10:49 crc: which retroforth should i use? konilo? 2023-06-26 10:15:25 if you had to suggest one of the forths you've written so far 2023-06-26 10:15:31 which one? 2023-06-26 10:45:37 for most people, retroforth 2023-06-26 10:46:23 it fits better into modern systems; has better documentation; & more examples 2023-06-26 10:47:01 konilo is better if you want a little system that's self contained or are running on resource constrained systems 2023-06-26 10:49:05 my personal use is now mixed; I spend most of my time using konilo for writing & small programs, and use retroforth to do external tasks. E.g., I have a small wiki I write in konilo, but retro is used to generate the HTML files when I publish 2023-06-26 15:44:09 hmm, i cant seem to get retroforth to compile, it can't find strlcpy despite being able to previously compile it 2023-06-26 15:48:27 hmm, it seems that the commit that splits the makefile is at fault here 2023-06-26 16:02:24 ah i see the problem now 2023-06-26 16:03:14 gnumakefile does not load the header at all after it got split 2023-06-26 16:04:53 a severe lack of "ENABLED += -DNEEDS_STRL" 2023-06-26 16:05:24 crc: do you take patches? 2023-06-26 16:09:22 yes 2023-06-26 16:10:56 excellent 2023-06-26 16:11:19 where should i send these? 2023-06-26 16:11:23 and should i use fossil for that? 2023-06-26 16:12:36 `fossil diff` would create a patch, or you could manually diff. 2023-06-26 16:13:45 crc@forthworks.com 2023-06-26 16:14:33 ah, good. 2023-06-26 16:14:43 give me a moment to clean things up first 2023-06-26 16:16:09 never done fossil before 2023-06-26 16:21:21 fossil help diff 2023-06-26 16:39:51 crc: apologies for the delay 2023-06-26 16:39:52 i sent it 2023-06-26 16:45:13 Thanks; I'll merge it in tonight 2023-06-26 17:13:19 tyvm